Seeds for energy
Sep 1, 2008 12:00 PM, By Lynn Grooms
A New Provision in the 2008 Farm Bill's Energy Title could be just the incentive some producers need to test growing biomass for huge renewable energy markets ahead.
The new Biomass Crop Assistance Program (BCAP) may help solve “the chicken or the egg problem” in the development of the cellulosic ethanol industry, says Anna Rath, vice president, commercial development, Ceres Inc.
The problem definitely is a question of which comes first: Many growers have been interested in growing dedicated energy crops but have not had a market for them, and cellulosic ethanol producers have been unwilling to construct plants without readily available feedstock nearby.
However, with significant investments from the federal government, continued improvements in cellulosic ethanol production economics, and improvements in biomass crop yields, the large-scale production of energy crops is drawing nearer.
What is the potential? The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 amended the Renewable Fuels Standard to provide for 36 billion gallons of renewable fuel in 2022. Just 15 billion gallons of the 36-billion-gallon target will come from corn starch-based biofuels. The remaining 21 billion gallons will come from other sources, such as energy crops, ag residues or municipal wastes.
Russ Sanders, director of marketing, Pioneer Hi-Bred, figures that if each ton of biomass produces at least 75 gallons of cellulosic ethanol, 280 million tons of biomass will be needed to produce 21 billion gallons of renewable fuel.
Energy crops are not yet well understood. But several public institutions and private sector companies are increasing their focus on how to produce, harvest, store and transport them.
To help growers through the learning curve, the BCAP will enable biorefineries and grower groups to apply for up to a 75% cost share on the establishment of energy crops. The program also will enable growers to receive an undeclared amount for ongoing annual payments until a biorefinery begins to purchase their feedstocks.
This program will provide for five-year contracts for herbaceous crops and 15-year contracts for woody crops. It also will provide incentives for producers to harvest, store and transport biomass to bioenergy facilities.
Although the BCAP has no designated funding yet, the USDA is expected to have flexibility in its design. A production tax credit for up to $1.01/gal. will be available through December 31, 2012.
First energy seed brand
Ceres, Thousand Oaks, CA, develops energy crops that can be grown for use in cellulosic ethanol production and biopower. The company recently announced it will market energy crop seed and traits under the brand name Blade Energy Crops. Because Blade Energy Crops will be the first multi-crop energy seed brand, a great deal of its seed could be used in the biomass program over the next few years. Ceres has scaled up seed production and is taking orders this fall for 2009 planting.
The new lineup includes two switchgrass varieties bred specifically for cellulosic ethanol production: EG 1101 was bred from Alamo switchgrass, and EG 1102's parental variety is Kanlow.
Both varieties provide a 10 to 30% improvement in biomass yield over their parents, Ceres's Rath says. The new varieties have been developed for improved establishment. In addition, they have been shown to work well in both biochemical and thermochemical conversion technologies.
These lowland switchgrass varieties are best adapted to the South and Southeast. Ceres also is working on varieties adapted to more northern locations and is sponsoring research at South Dakota State University to develop improved upland varieties for the northern Great Plains.
Arvid Boe, SDSU plant breeder, notes that switchgrass can compete with conventional crops on semiarid land. Switchgrass can produce relatively large amounts of biomass under both good and poor growing conditions, he says.
Starting this fall, growers will be able to book seed at www.BladeEnergy.com. An agronomic team will be available to answer grower questions. Ceres also is working with Noble Foundation extension agronomists at various universities and independent crop consultants to provide agronomic assistance to growers.
Conserve and Profit
In a recent survey, 60% of approximately 2,000 farmers said they have adopted nutrient management plans, and more than half said they have fully adopted conservation tillage, nutrient management, grassed waterways and integrated pest management (IPM). Mostly from the Midwest, these respondents represent about 2.5 million acres of cropland.
“Although we are pleased that high numbers of these farmers indicate they are utilizing conservation practices, anything less than full adoption should be of concern not only to the fertilizer industry, but to the entire agriculture community,” says Ford West, president of The Fertilizer Institute (TFI). “As the public spotlight continues to shine heavily on biofuels, it's critical that producers understand the public relations and policy implications that could follow anything but outstanding environmental performance.”
The Conservation Technology Information Center (CTIC) and TFI conducted the survey to better understand farmers' use of best management practices (BMP) and conservation practices. At a time of record-high commodity prices, some farmers may hesitate to adopt conservation methods.
“These are new times. We encourage farmers to look beyond this current year at the bigger picture,” says CTIC Executive Director Karen Scanlon. “A comprehensive system of conservation practices will not only help to maintain valuable resources, but also build soil quality and manage inputs.”
Although farmers are getting high prices for commodities, they also are paying high input costs, Scanlon says. Conservation practices, she says, can help farmers apply inputs at the right time and in the right way to save on fuel and fertilizer costs.
Farmers also see that good conservation practices last over the long term, Scanlon says. “Farmers who have no-tilled for years aren't going back to their old practices,” she states. “They don't want to compromise the organic matter that they've built up by reverting back to tillage.”
The survey did reveal that some producers are not choosing conservation practices. Scanlon says the most common reason that farmers give for not adopting conservation practices is an economic one.
Some growers have concerns about the cost of specialized equipment or soil testing. Others are worried that conservation practices will lower crop yields.
Farmers need to pencil out the economics over time, Scanlon says, noting that organizations like CTIC can help farmers understand the economics of transitioning from conventional tillage to no-till, for example, and see the financial picture from year to year. CTIC focuses on an entire system (not just no-till, for example, but nutrient management, cover crops, IPM, buffers and so on).
Cost sharing
The survey respondents prefer financial assistance over technical assistance when it comes to implementing buffers, water and sediment control, and other conservation measures.
Seeds for energy
Sep 1, 2008 12:00 PM, By Lynn Grooms
A New Provision in the 2008 Farm Bill's Energy Title could be just the incentive some producers need to test growing biomass for huge renewable energy markets ahead.
The new Biomass Crop Assistance Program (BCAP) may help solve “the chicken or the egg problem” in the development of the cellulosic ethanol industry, says Anna Rath, vice president, commercial development, Ceres Inc.
The problem definitely is a question of which comes first: Many growers have been interested in growing dedicated energy crops but have not had a market for them, and cellulosic ethanol producers have been unwilling to construct plants without readily available feedstock nearby.
However, with significant investments from the federal government, continued improvements in cellulosic ethanol production economics, and improvements in biomass crop yields, the large-scale production of energy crops is drawing nearer.
What is the potential? The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 amended the Renewable Fuels Standard to provide for 36 billion gallons of renewable fuel in 2022. Just 15 billion gallons of the 36-billion-gallon target will come from corn starch-based biofuels. The remaining 21 billion gallons will come from other sources, such as energy crops, ag residues or municipal wastes.
Russ Sanders, director of marketing, Pioneer Hi-Bred, figures that if each ton of biomass produces at least 75 gallons of cellulosic ethanol, 280 million tons of biomass will be needed to produce 21 billion gallons of renewable fuel.
Energy crops are not yet well understood. But several public institutions and private sector companies are increasing their focus on how to produce, harvest, store and transport them.
To help growers through the learning curve, the BCAP will enable biorefineries and grower groups to apply for up to a 75% cost share on the establishment of energy crops. The program also will enable growers to receive an undeclared amount for ongoing annual payments until a biorefinery begins to purchase their feedstocks.
This program will provide for five-year contracts for herbaceous crops and 15-year contracts for woody crops. It also will provide incentives for producers to harvest, store and transport biomass to bioenergy facilities.
Although the BCAP has no designated funding yet, the USDA is expected to have flexibility in its design. A production tax credit for up to $1.01/gal. will be available through December 31, 2012.
First energy seed brand
Ceres, Thousand Oaks, CA, develops energy crops that can be grown for use in cellulosic ethanol production and biopower. The company recently announced it will market energy crop seed and traits under the brand name Blade Energy Crops. Because Blade Energy Crops will be the first multi-crop energy seed brand, a great deal of its seed could be used in the biomass program over the next few years. Ceres has scaled up seed production and is taking orders this fall for 2009 planting.
The new lineup includes two switchgrass varieties bred specifically for cellulosic ethanol production: EG 1101 was bred from Alamo switchgrass, and EG 1102's parental variety is Kanlow.
Both varieties provide a 10 to 30% improvement in biomass yield over their parents, Ceres's Rath says. The new varieties have been developed for improved establishment. In addition, they have been shown to work well in both biochemical and thermochemical conversion technologies.
These lowland switchgrass varieties are best adapted to the South and Southeast. Ceres also is working on varieties adapted to more northern locations and is sponsoring research at South Dakota State University to develop improved upland varieties for the northern Great Plains.
Arvid Boe, SDSU plant breeder, notes that switchgrass can compete with conventional crops on semiarid land. Switchgrass can produce relatively large amounts of biomass under both good and poor growing conditions, he says.
Starting this fall, growers will be able to book seed at www.BladeEnergy.com. An agronomic team will be available to answer grower questions. Ceres also is working with Noble Foundation extension agronomists at various universities and independent crop consultants to provide agronomic assistance to growers.
Conserve and Profit
In a recent survey, 60% of approximately 2,000 farmers said they have adopted nutrient management plans, and more than half said they have fully adopted conservation tillage, nutrient management, grassed waterways and integrated pest management (IPM). Mostly from the Midwest, these respondents represent about 2.5 million acres of cropland.
“Although we are pleased that high numbers of these farmers indicate they are utilizing conservation practices, anything less than full adoption should be of concern not only to the fertilizer industry, but to the entire agriculture community,” says Ford West, president of The Fertilizer Institute (TFI). “As the public spotlight continues to shine heavily on biofuels, it's critical that producers understand the public relations and policy implications that could follow anything but outstanding environmental performance.”
The Conservation Technology Information Center (CTIC) and TFI conducted the survey to better understand farmers' use of best management practices (BMP) and conservation practices. At a time of record-high commodity prices, some farmers may hesitate to adopt conservation methods.
“These are new times. We encourage farmers to look beyond this current year at the bigger picture,” says CTIC Executive Director Karen Scanlon. “A comprehensive system of conservation practices will not only help to maintain valuable resources, but also build soil quality and manage inputs.”
Although farmers are getting high prices for commodities, they also are paying high input costs, Scanlon says. Conservation practices, she says, can help farmers apply inputs at the right time and in the right way to save on fuel and fertilizer costs.
Farmers also see that good conservation practices last over the long term, Scanlon says. “Farmers who have no-tilled for years aren't going back to their old practices,” she states. “They don't want to compromise the organic matter that they've built up by reverting back to tillage.”
The survey did reveal that some producers are not choosing conservation practices. Scanlon says the most common reason that farmers give for not adopting conservation practices is an economic one.
Some growers have concerns about the cost of specialized equipment or soil testing. Others are worried that conservation practices will lower crop yields.
Farmers need to pencil out the economics over time, Scanlon says, noting that organizations like CTIC can help farmers understand the economics of transitioning from conventional tillage to no-till, for example, and see the financial picture from year to year. CTIC focuses on an entire system (not just no-till, for example, but nutrient management, cover crops, IPM, buffers and so on).
Cost sharing
The survey respondents prefer financial assistance over technical assistance when it comes to implementing buffers, water and sediment control, and other conservation measures.